Indie Ogden Guide to Northern Utah State Parks

Did you know Utah has 43 state parks? And?that?s?just the STATE parks, we are also home to some well known National parks and thousands upon thousands of acres of National Forrest land. The Utah state parks manage?43 state parks ? from Bear Lake State Park at the Utah/Idaho border to Edge of the Cedars State Park Museum deep in the Four Corners region, and everywhere in between. Whats often NOT know is that the state parks?also administer the Utah off-highway vehicle, boating, and trails programs. The State Parks department work to provide access to waterways and trails, and promote education, safety, and resource protection.

Parks are important to our health. I truly believe this.?Recreation and leisure activities can help alleviate depression. Participating in recreation activities also reduce alienation,?loneliness and isolation, all of which contribute to depression. Recreation provides a social atmosphere that?draws people out of their houses and into community life. Physical activity and recreation can increase our self confidence, quality of life, and allow us to ?unplug? from our day to day lives. Recreating in State Parks?brings neighbors together, encourages safer, cleaner?neighborhoods and creates a livelier community atmosphere. Parks and recreational facilities also help improve a community?s image, socioeconomic status and enhance the area?s desirability.?Here?s another cool thing the parks provide: The economic benefits of State parks -?http://stateparks.utah.gov/about/economicbenefits

Open space, park and recreation areas are an ideal medium for encouraging and developing stronger stewardship of the land. People who enjoy outdoor recreation become more familiar with natural resources and the
environment. This increased knowledge helps them understand how their personal actions can affect the environment. Further, the parks encourage volunteerism.?The National Park Service, for example, had 125,000 volunteers contribute?4.5 million hours of service, valued at over 72 million dollars (NPS, 2002). The dedication and pride that people have for?parks and recreation areas leads to increased interest and involvement in other aspects of the community.

So, now that we know some of the amazing things the parks can do for us? here are the ones closest to Ogden- and a bit more about them. Here we go, from North to South, the closest Parks (by car) from Ogden!

Bear Lake State Park?

I?ve camped here myself, and its one of our families favorite weekend trips. Bear lake is often called the ?Caribbean?of the?Rockies? and I see why. Its bright blue waters, and shallows which warm and allow for comfortable swimming, make Bear Lake an ideal vacation spot. Bear lake has something for everyone, swimming, fishing, water-sports, sailing, even scuba diving! The campground is on the beach,?separated?by a line of trees and brush ? it can be a bit buggy so bring some spray, aside from that its absolutely LOVELY! The town of Garden City has cute little shops, several?restaurants, and a KOA Grocery store and True Value hardware store for any shopping needs you may have.

Bear Lake State Park
1030 N Bear Lake Blvd
Garden City, UT 84028
435-946-3343 ? main park number
801-322-3770 ? camping reservations
800-322-3770 ? toll-free camping reservations
parkcomment@utah.gov

Hyrum Reservoir State Park

image via Go-Utah.com

I?m going to be honest- until a few weeks ago, I?didn?t?even know Hyrum Reservoir existed- and I am a huge fan of the parks! I thought I had seen them all up here, turns out I was wrong.?Hyrum State Park offers many recreation opportunities including fishing, boating, and camping. Surrounded by tall, shady trees, Hyrum provides an excellent place for an afternoon picnic, or spend the whole weekend trolling on the lake catching yellow perch, rainbow trout, bluegill, and largemouth bass.

Hyrum State Park
405 West 300 South
Hyrum, UT 84319
435-245-6866 ? main park number
801-322-3770 ? camping reservations
800-322-3770 ? toll-free camping reservations
parkcomment@utah.gov

Willard Bay State Park

Boat, swim,?water-ski? and fish on the warm waters of Willard Bay. Camp under tall cottonwood trees that frame the night sky. Anglers fish for walleye, channel catfish, black crappie, and wipers. During winter months, Willard Bay is a wildlife watching area for nesting eagles. Two areas, North and South Marinas, offer all the amenities for a weekend at the bay. Willard Bay?s camping sites are shady but may be buggy, so bring spray.

Willard Bay North Marina
Select a day-use cabana on the beach, launch your boat, and pick the perfect campsite with full hookups at the North Marina.

Willard Bay South Marina
This boat launching and camping area offers modern facilities for overnight and day-use.

Willard Bay State Park
900 West 650 North #A
Willard, UT 84340-9999
801-782-2321 ? entrance gate
435-734-9494 ? main park number
801-322-3770 ? camping reservations
800-322-3770 ? toll-free camping reservations
parkcomment@utah.gov

Antelope Island State Park

Antelope Island in the Winter, image via ScenicUtah.com, by photographer Ray Boren

Antelope Island State Park is the largest island in the Great Salt Lake. View a free-roaming herd of 500 bison, and pronghorn and bighorn sheep that share the rangelands. Hike, mountain bike or horseback ride along backcountry trails for spectacular views of Great Salt Lake and island scenery. Check in at the visitor center for maps and information on the island?s unique biology, geology and history. You can plan your trip to coincide with one or a few of the?fun and educational events?they offer throughout the year ? ?which include campfire programs, historical activities at Fielding Garr Ranch, star parties, Junior Ranger programs for children, and art and photography exhibits. Check out their?event calendar?frequently for new additions. Antelope Island also offers camping at Bridger Bay.

Horseback riding is available all year long.?Schedule your riding adventure online?at least 48 hours in advance or by calling (888) 878-8002.

Antelope Island State Park
4528 West 1700 South
Syracuse, UT 84075
801-773-2941 ? main park number
801-322-3770 ? camping reservations
800-322-3770 ? toll-free camping reservations
parkcomment@utah.gov

Now, you?ve noticed on the bottom of the map there I?ve included a few more parks- these are a bit further away but well worth the trip. Click the links to learn more about these parks and the amazing things they offer!

East Canyon

Great Salt Lake Marina

East Canyon

Historic Union Pacific Trail?

Rockport

& This is the Place Heritage Park

Related posts:

1. Indie Ogden?s Guide to Northern Utah Getaways
2. Indie Ogden Spotlight ? Haunted Ogden: A Ghostly Guide to Utah?s Spookiest City
3. Did You Know?
4. A Mama?s guide to local parks
5. Indie Ogden?s Guide to Easter Fun!

Source: http://indieogdenutah.com/2012/11/indie-ogden-guide-to-northern-utah-state-parks/

elvis presley vanessa bryant vanessa bryant Prince Harry naked Prince Harry Vegas Melky Cabrera Mayim Bialik

Veterans sue railroad over fatal crash in Texas

LUBBOCK, Texas (AP) ? Two Army veterans and their wives on Wednesday sued the railroad company whose train hit a truck carrying veterans and their spouses during a parade in Texas.

Four veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan were killed and 16 more people were injured in the Nov. 15 collision. They had been riding on a flatbed truck in the parade organized to honor wounded veterans for their military service and were in the process of crossing the tracks when the crash happened. Officials have said the truck entered the crossing after the warning signals began sounding.

The lawsuit was filed by Richard Sanchez and Todd King and their wives, but one of their attorneys said he expects other veterans to join it. He said the lawsuit was filed with just two couples because steps needed to be taken quickly to preserve evidence.

The lawsuit claims negligence and recklessness on the part of Union Pacific Railroad Inc. and Smith Industries Inc., the company that owned the truck, led to the collision. It was filed in Midland, where the crash happened.

The veterans have not asked for a specific amount in damages because their "No. 1 desire is that no accident like this ever happens again," said Bob Pottroff, one of the attorneys representing the two couples.

The lawsuit claims the railroad was negligent in 28 ways, including failing to provide reasonable and timely audible and visual warning of the approaching train and failure to provide a safe railroad crossing. It also says the train did not brake or otherwise attempt to slow and the railroad hadn't fixed what it claims are hazardous conditions posed by the road grade.

Union Pacific spokeswoman Raquel Espinoza-Williams said the company would not comment on the lawsuit specifically, but she noted in an email that federal investigators have already determined the truck moved onto the tracks after the red flashing lights and bells activated.

"Disregarding active warning signals is extremely dangerous, and we urge drivers to stop once the red flashing lights and bells activate," she wrote.

The lawsuit accuses Smith Industries of having a driver who, among other things, failed to keep a proper lookout and didn't exercise reasonable care for the veterans on the truck's trailer.

The attorney representing Smith Industries, Jimmie B. Todd of Odessa, was away on vacation and could not be reached for comment.

The driver of the truck, 50-year-old Dale Andrew Hayden of Midland, is an Army veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and is employed by Smith Industries.

Also Wednesday, the Texas Department of Transportation released documents showing the crossing's warning system was designed to become operational at least 30 seconds before the arrival of trains. On the day of the crash, only 20 seconds elapsed from the time the system was activated to the train's arrival, according to the NTSB.

Twenty seconds meets federal guidelines, but railroads can ? and do ? provide longer intervals at some crossings.

The documents, released to The Associated Press and other media organizations in response to requests under the Texas Public Information Act, do not show whether the crossing had been upgraded or altered since it was completed in 1991.

A TxDOT official said in an email released with the documents that the crossing was designed for trains that went up to 25 mph, but they now travel on that line at up to 70 mph. Darin Kosmak, section director for the department's rail-highway division, wrote in the email to TxDOT's legal counsel that the state expected the railroad to upgrade its safety mechanism to match the greater speeds, but had not verified that changes were made.

Espinoza-Williams said in an email that the design documents released by the state "do not reflect current conditions at the ... crossing, which clearly has more than six trains per day operating at a maximum speed of more than 25 mph."

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/veterans-sue-railroad-over-fatal-crash-texas-203401463.html

hunger games trailer hunger games trailer in plain sight hunger games movie review bats hunger games review jeff saturday

Apple gets Dutch sales ban on some Samsung Galaxy products

News

A Dutch court has banned sales of Samsung Electronics? Galaxy products that infringe on an Apple patent describing a way to scroll through a photo gallery using a touchscreen.

The ban only applies to Galaxy products that run Android 2.2.1 through 2.3.7 that don?t use Samsung?s new proprietary photo gallery software, the Court of The Hague ruled on Wednesday. Galaxy products with Android 3.0 and higher don?t infringe on the patent, the court ruled.

Apple patented a way to scroll past the edge of a zoomed-in photo and see a glimpse of the next in a series of images, after which the initial photo bounces back onto the screen, a technique that Samsung has used in its Galaxy products. Samsung?s new proprietary photo gallery software replaces that bounce-back feature with a ?blue flash? that illuminates the edge of the image.

Samsung?already lost a case?over the same patent after preliminary proceedings in the Netherlands last year, leading to a sales ban on the then-infringing Galaxy S, SII and Ace. After the verdict, Samsung adjusted its photo gallery software as a work around, and said it stopped delivering infringing products to clients as of the end of August 2011.

During the plea hearing in September, Samsung said that, since the last verdict, it uses its own technology in all its products in the Netherlands. Samsung, however failed to provide the court with evidence of the change,?annoying the panel of judges.

?The argument raised by Samsung at the hearing that Samsung Benelux does not sell the infringing products any more, cannot lead to a rejection of the ban,? wrote Judge Peter Blok, who presided over the panel of three judges in?the verdict. Blok said he would grant the ban because Samsung refused to sign a declaration of abstinence committing to not infringing the patent.

The court ordered Samsung to tell Apple how much net profit it made from sales of infringing Galaxy products since June 27, 2011. A separate court procedure will determine how much of that profit Samsung must pay Apple.

If Samsung continues to infringe on the patent, it has to pay Apple a penalty of ?100,000 ($124,000) for every day it violates the ban, the court ruled.

A Samsung spokeswoman said the company was disappointed with the court?s ruling. Apple did not respond to a request for comment.

The Court of The Hague?recently ruled?that Samsung does not infringe on an Apple multi-touch patent in another Dutch lawsuit between the companies. In January, the court is set to rule in yet another case between the two in a case about tablet design rights.

Source: http://www.macworld.com.au/news/apple-gets-sales-ban-on-some-samsung-galaxy-products-in-the-netherlands-80875/

national grid LIPA cnn news MBTA Cnn Live Garcinia Cambogia Little Things One Direction

Understanding How to Market Intuitive Website Content and Design ...

Dynamic website design is clearly becoming the latest business wave of internet design. Much of the reason is due to the proliferation and easy access of smart phones and mobile devices that display web pages. Because the average consumer today is relying far more on his mobile device to find businesses, products and services while on the go, dynamic website design is putting responsive businesses in the forefront of those consumer searches. However, a new aspect is also quickly becoming apparent in mobile internet searches: localization.

Dynamic website design essentially determines what kind of internet device a person is reaching a website with and transmits the best website format for that device. If the reader is using a regular desktop computer, then he will see a traditional web page. Conversely, if he?s using a tablet or a smartphone, then he will see a mobile version of the website which loads faster and works better with mobile devices.

Localization of a website takes the matter a step further. Now, not only does the website understand what device a person is using, it can also determine if the person is in the nearby area, pulling up web site content that is specific to a local customer and directing him to the brick-and-mortar address of the business, if it applies. This design feature can even dictate what language the website is displayed on a user?s device.

While it?s a straightforward process creating the necessary website design to trigger the two reactions to mobile devices, the content and benefits still have to be written in such a way that makes them appealing to both the customer, as well as the small business desiring local awareness.

Marketing these services along with relevant website content to small businesses depends highly on showing a company how both internet features bring a local customer right to the small business? doorstep. That means the web site content writer and designer both have to work together to produce a customized model of what a small business? redesigned website would look like, specific to local interests. The goal, of course, is that when an internet user pulls out his phone and looks for a local service or product, he will find the business whose web site meets his need the fastest in the immediate area. This concept can be discussed with a sales pitch, but a picture is worth a thousand words. Small businesses are truly convinced when they see an actual model of tailored content and dynamic website design actually working.

A designer and web site content writer can?t necessarily go modeling websites without being paid first by a given client. Charity doesn?t keep a content provider fed. So the next best approach, marketing-wise, is to show a new potential client how the two internet tools and tailored web site content work using a past project or similar business that is already up and running online. Seeing is believing, and using a visual model can convince small business owners quickly of dynamic design/localization internet combination benefits for their brick-and-mortar stores.

Tom L is a freelance writer available on WriterAccess, a marketplace where clients and expert writers connect for assignments.

Source: http://www.writeraccess.com/blog/understanding-how-to-market-intuitive-website-content-and-design-to-small-business/

blake griffin dunk florida primary full force odd fellows eli whitney blake griffin dunk on kendrick perkins kendrick perkins

Direct Mailing Advice Interactive Businesses Need To Grow ...

Reminiscing back a few decades, there actually was a time when it worked much better than any mass advertising method. It still has its place in the marketers? arsenal and works equivocally fine to that of other current marketing trends.

Sure, internet marketing beats every other marketing directive when it comes to scope, reach, effectiveness, cost, and analytics. Direct mailing has its own charm, however, as it can be leveraged strategically to take your marketing stratagems to new heights. It can be used in tandem with your usual marketing channels to delight your customers and bring your business multiple benefits.

Shooting in the dark with direct mailing won?t work, of course. Picking up an orphan database and sending mails is expensive, abortive, and won?t fetch you even a fraction of what you spent on the campaign. What you need is a strategic approach to direct mailing which plugs into other forums of marketing and works best with other forms of marketing they also deal with. In a nutshell, Advice Interactive just knows how to launch direct mail campaigns that work for your business as they have since the era when marketing was still presumed to be a billboard thing.

Mailing List Needs Continue Rising

Mailing lists are resounding customer databases which are usually segregated according to geographic area, interest and other demographics for the purpose of sending email campaigns to the correct recipients. Marketing best practices dictate that these mailing lists should be built ethically, one customer at a time, which they call opt-in marketing. Advice Interactive strategically makes mailing list creation through opt-in data collection happen for your business.

There?s a simple premise for building mailing lists: let interested visitors build it, and they will stay.? Since mailing lists aren?t just numbers, names, or databases, you should never collect them as such: customers that your business depends on are formed through relationship nurturing. Many company clamber at streamlining the process of customer segmentation, lead scoring and nurturing the information you have so future mailings see higher rates of responsiveness.? In fact, mailing lists turn ?sour? due to improper permission-based confirmations or poorly ?scraped? information.

Mailing list creation has become the relentless pursuit of perceived list value ? a perception that makes businesses just give up on finding the right methods in creating an appropriate list or begin approaching questionable email list collection methods such as harvesting, scraping or buying used lists which are irrelevant or outdated.

Partner Up With Experience

Advice Interactive takes an aggressive yet pragmatic approach to email list building and mailing list creation services utilizing only the industry best practices. For instance, they only use opt-in marketing for list building and thereafter proffer our email marketing expertise towards development of solid leads for your business. ?Don?t just scrape together mailing lists:? create relationships using the professional marketing guidance of Advice Interactive, the Inc. 500 marketing showstopper who?ll find real customers today and shoo them your way.

Over the years, society has become acclimated to wonderful companies who have been instrumental in getting direct mail marketing where it sits today. Seek the tutelage of vendors, customers, mentors, friends or your own partners for loads of inspiration and guidance when kicking off campaigns or finding lists to purchase.

Source: http://www.business2community.com/consumer-marketing/direct-mailing-advice-interactive-businesses-need-to-grow-0341964

megamillions drawing olbermann mega millions march 30 lucky numbers odds of winning mega millions mary mary sag aftra merger

Daily news roundup: November 27, 2012

  

  

Another big news day is done, and I sit here with a frosty beverage winding down for the evening. I like to do that by catching up on all the stuff on the Internet I might have missed through the day. If that sounds like you, cheers! I'll make it easier for you. Here's the highlights of today's events.

Hardware stuff

• The Nexus 4 is in the Play Store again (briefly)
• See the Galaxy Note 2 is some crazy awesome liquid acid trip
• Meizu brings out some sexy hardware in China
• US Cellular getting a Galaxy S3 mini of it's own in the Axiom
• Nexus 4 is once again in-stock at T-Mobile

Software stuff

• The Nook app goes to Europe
• 4.2.1 update hits the Nexus 4 and Nexus 10; and the Nexus 7; and even the Galaxy Nexus
• Hamilton's Great Adventure comes to mobile
• Microsoft's Outlook.com app is designed for Donut
• 4.2.1 source drops
• More HTC One X Jelly Bean goodness
• F-Droid is the Android FOSS store
• Rdio gets a new look
• Canadian Galaxy S3 seeing some of the Jelly Bean love

Absolutely awesome stuff

• Nerdtalkin' with Brian Klug

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/TrvmwSD5SuM/story01.htm

rod parsley barry sanders jr nick carter sister recruiting rankings san onofre paula deen birth control recall

Why is the Supreme Court Interested in Patent Cases? | IPWatchdog ...

Seth Waxman

Have you ever wondered why the Supreme Court is taking so many patent cases over the last few years? ?In Part I of my interview with Seth Waxman?we learned that while he was the Solicitor General of the United States, and even before ascending to that position, he advocated within the Department of Justice for at least occasionally seeking Supreme Court review of Federal Circuit cases. That lead from a trickle of cases to what has become a handful of cases year after year.

Personally I think there are plenty of cases that the Federal Circuit gets wrong and should be taken by the Supreme Court to get things correct. But that is now what the Supreme Court does. ?They are looking for meaty issues, not just to get some esoteric point of patent law correct. In fact, it is my observation that the more esoteric and the more incorrect the Federal Circuit the less likely the Supreme Court will get involved. But that is just my view from the sidelines.

Waxman, steeped in the rules, procedures and art of Supreme Court advocacy drills down deeper.

WAXMAN: Well, I think it?s a combination of several different things.? When you?re talking about patent decisions of the Federal Circuit, for purposes of answering this question it?s useful to distinguish between rulings about litigation procedure in patent cases and rulings about the meaning of substantive patent law.? With respect to the former, it?s easy to see why the Supreme Court?s interest would be piqued if a petitioner says, as it did for example in Medimmune, ?there?s a general rule that applies across all the regional circuits with respect to standing in declaratory judgment actions. ?But the Federal Circuit applies a different ?rule ?in patent cases.?? That is just the kind of disuniformity the Supreme Court is looking for.? It?s proverbial ?split in the circuits? that the Court feels it needs to address ? where a particular law or set of procedures is being interpreted or applied differently in one part of the country than another.

The paradigmatic role of the Supreme Court is to harmonize the application of federal law across the country.? So when different circuits are at loggerheads about what a particular law means, or how a particular doctrine is applied, only the Supreme Court can resolve it.? Several of the cases the Supreme Court has taken from the Federal Circuit in recent years have involved ?procedures sanction by the Federl Circuit that ddidn?t strike the Supreme Court as warranted a patent-exceptional. The declaratory judgment standard was one obvious example.

Another was the eBay case, involving the standrds for ?injunctive relief was another.? The other packet of cases are cases that annunciate substantive patent principles.? The test for obviousness.? The standard of review when one is challenging patent validity based on art that the examiner never had, arguably never had before him or her.? Subject matter eligibility for new life forms, or software, or things like that.? And there I think the Court is taking cases where it genuinely is skeptical about whether the Federal Circuit has decided the issue correctly.? And you can say that the Federal Circuit is sort of unique in this regard because by and large the Supreme Court doesn?t view its role, surprisingly, as one of error correction.? It?s not grounds for certiorari on the grounds that the 4th circuit, the 8th circuit, or the 9th circuit just decided it?s wrong.? They are looking principally for cases in which the Supreme Court is the only court that can resolve a lack of uniformity across the country.

With respect to substantive patent law, obviously that never applies because the Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction so that there?s rarely an instance, maybe Coronado vs. Holmes might be some sort of example to the contrary, but there rarely is a split in the Circuits over the standard for determining obviousness with respect to a patent because no other court of appeals is ever going to answer that question.? And therefore it?s appropriate for the Supreme Court of the United States to assure itself that in fact the Federal Circuit, which has specialized jurisdiction, is in fact answering significant questions of patent doctrine in a way that the majority of the Supreme Court thinks is correct.? And that certainly characterizes a number of patent cases that the Supreme Court has taken in recent years.

The other thing I think that?s at play here, and maybe it?s the principal reason is a point that I made earlier which is our economy depends utterly on intellectual property.? That is in fostering innovation and inventiveness in the manner in which the framers of the Constitution understood needed to be fostered.? That is within appropriately countered system of protections for discoveries and inventions and novel expression.? But that doesn?t smother innovation by competitors and by others.? And because our economy is so utterly tied to intellectual property the Supreme Court correctly understands that this is a substantive area in which it is very, very important for the correct balance to be struck.

And I think the final reason for the increase in the cases is maybe the same reason that I?m attracted to doing cases like this, which is they are just darn interesting as an intellectual matter.? You get to learn about a technology that you don?t know as much about as you need to to decide a case.? And you get to learn and scrutinize and question the contours of substantive legal doctrine that you?re not otherwise familiar with.? I don?t know how comforting that is the Patent Bar.

QUINN: That?s what I was just going to say.? And I would agree with what you say, but to hear you articulate it just makes me want to sigh and say that?s exactly why I?m scared when the Supreme Court takes a case, because I understand when you look at this globally, why should patents be different?? And the argument that I always hear is is well, copyrights are an exclusive right and you?re doing it different from copyright law.? But for better or for worse since practically the beginning of intellectual property law in the United States, copyrights have been different than patents.? They?re calling them an exclusive right is almost comical because there are so many ways that you can use a copyright that directly infringes, that copies the entirety of what you?re doing that is okay.? And it?s not exclusive.? Fair use swallows these rights whole in a lot of cases.? And there is no concept of fair use in patent matters.? But how do you lay the foundation to explain that, no, these things are different?? When you can?t get an injunction as a matter of right after you?ve won, then what good is the patent because the patent is supposed to be practically an injunction when the Patent Office gives it to you.? It says, don?t do this stuff and if you do you?re going to get punished.

WAXMAN:?You?re certainly preaching to the choir on this issue.

QUINN: I know I am.

WAXMAN: But I think you?ve identified something that?s actually quite important. Which is in an era in which the Supreme Court is increasingly interested in the contours of patent law and practice.? And in which therefore most of the judges on the Federal Circuit are trying very hard to decide cases and write their opinions so that they are accessible by the Supreme Court of the United States and are written in a manner that?s sensitive to the reality that they are subject to review by not just a higher court by a court of generalists.? It?s extremely important for advocates before the Federal Circuit in anything other than the run of the mill claim construction dispute to advocate the case in a way that is sensitive to the way that whatever issues that are going to be decided may look to the Supreme Court, may look to Congress, may look to generalists generally.? And I think many of the Federal Circuit judges welcome help in this regard, welcome advocacy that?s sensitive to this new reality.? And which in the end may be all to the good.? That is having a clubby isolated bar and bench that understands all these things and the advocacy is pitched to specialists and the specialists write opinions that are intelligible to and useful for the cognoscenti is fine if you fell in that cone.? But if you?re not, it?s not that helpful and in a system in which the final review in the judiciary or in the? legislator is made by generalists it?s really important that cases be? even in a specialized area, be briefed and argued in a way that?s accessible to and intelligible by generalists.? And it may be another reason why it seems particularly edifying to me to be a resolute generalist as to all areas of the law.? And makes it less intimidating to argue patent cases before a specialized court.

TO BE CONTINUED?

Part I ??Exclusive with Seth Waxman, Supreme Court Patent Superstar

Part II ??Seth Waxman Discusses Advocacy in the Supreme Court

Source: http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/11/27/why-is-the-supreme-court-interested-in-patent-cases/id=30523/

linkedin Samsung Galaxy S3 usps bachelor pad bachelor pad Green Coffee Bean Extract september 11